Information about http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0323209/040421comp0323209.pdf

Tags: america federal trade commission, bankruptcy cases, bankruptcy code, california corporation, delaware limited liability company, district of delaware, federal trade commission, federal trade commission act, limited liability company, mts inc, pjw, place of business, principal office, records books, respondent, states bankruptcy court, tower records, united states bankruptcy court, voluntary petitions, west sacramento california,
Pages: 4
Language: english
Created: Wed Apr 21 08:09:08 2004
Display cached document
Page 1
image
Page 2
image
Page 3
image
Page 4
image
                                                                           032-3209
                             UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                             FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION



                                     )
In the Matter of                     )
                                     )
MTS, INC., d/b/a TOWER               )
RECORDS/BOOKS/VIDEO,                 )              DOCKET NO.
a corporation,                       )
                                     )
                      and            )
                                     )
TOWER DIRECT, LLC, d/b/a             )
TOWERRECORDS.COM,                    )
a corporation.                       )
                                     )

                                         COMPLAINT

        The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that MTS, Inc., and Tower
Direct, LLC, corporations ("Respondents") have violated the provisions of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that this proceeding is in the public
interest, alleges:

1.     Respondent MTS, Inc., is a California corporation doing business as Tower
       Records/Books/Video with its principal office or place of business at 2500 Del Monte,
       West Sacramento, California 95691.

2.     Respondent Tower Direct, LLC, is a Delaware limited liability company doing business
       as TowerRecords.com and is a subsidiary of Respondent MTS, Inc. Its principal office or
       place of business is also at 2500 Del Monte, West Sacramento, California 95691.

3.     On February 9, 2004, Respondents and related entities filed voluntary petitions for relief
       under the reorganization provisions of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, Title 11
       U.S.C. 101 et seq., in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware,
       Case Nos. 04-10393-PJW through 04-10398-PJW, 04-10400-PJW, and 04-10403-PJW
       through 04-10410-PJW. On February 10, 2004, the bankruptcy cases were consolidated
       for administration, and a confirmation hearing was set for March 15, 2004. Pursuant to
       11 U.S.C. §§ 1106 and 1107, the Respondents remain in possession of their business and
       property as debtors-in-possession.


                                          Page 1 of 4
4.   The acts and practices of respondents as alleged in this complaint have been in or
     affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade
     Commission Act.

5.   Respondents have marketed and sold music and video recordings, books, and other
     entertainment products through the Internet at their Web site, www.TowerRecords.com
     (the "Tower Web site") since at least 1996. Respondents collect personal information
     from consumers who visit the Tower Web site and purchase Tower products online. This
     personal information includes name, billing address, shipping address, email address,
     telephone number, and all Tower products purchased online ­ such as music and video
     recordings, books, and other entertainment products ­ since 1996.

6.   Consumers who purchase products on the Tower Web site are assigned an order number
     and interact with Respondents' Web site using a software program called an
     "application." One of these applications is the Order Status application, which allows
     consumers to use their order number to view their purchase history.

7.   Since at least 1997, Respondents have disseminated or have caused to be disseminated
     various privacy policies on the Tower Web site, including but not necessarily limited to
     the attached Exhibit A, containing the following statements regarding the privacy and
     confidentiality of personal information collected through Respondents' Web site:

            Security & Privacy Information

                                         *   *   *

            Your privacy is important to us. TowerRecords.com is committed
            to safeguarding your privacy online. We will never share your
            personal information with anyone for any reason without your
            explicit permission.

                                         *   *   *

            How does TowerRecords.com protect my personal information?
            We use state-of-the-art technology to safeguard your personal
            information. All TowerRecords.com employees are required to
            acknowledge that they understand and will comply with this
            privacy policy. Employees who violate this policy will be
            subjected to disciplinary action, up to and including termination.

                                         *   *   *


            What security precautions are in place to protect the loss,

                                        Page 2 of 4
             misuse, or alteration of my information?
             Your TowerRecords.com Account information is password-protected.
             You and only you have access to this information . . . TowerRecords.com
             takes steps to ensure that your information is treated securely and in
             accordance with the relevant Terms of Service and this Privacy Policy.
             Unfortunately, no data transmission over the Internet can be guaranteed
             100% secure. While we strive to protect your personal information,
             TowerRecords.com cannot ensure or warrant the security or services, and
             you do so at your own risk. Once we receive your transmission, we make
             our best effort to ensure its security on our systems.

      Exhibit A, Tower Web Site Privacy Policy, December 2002 (emphasis in original).

8.    In November and December 2002, Respondents redesigned the "check out" portion of
      their Web site and rewrote the software code for the Order Status application. In
      rewriting the code, Respondents failed to ensure that all of the code from the original
      version had been rewritten and included, as appropriate, in the new version. As a result,
      the rewritten version of the Order Status application failed to include any "authentication
      code" to ensure that the consumer viewing purchase history information was the
      consumer to whom such information related. The rewritten code generated an email to
      consumers confirming their order and providing a URL that they could use to check the
      status of their order online (the "Order Status URL"). The Order Status URL contained
      the order number in clear text.

9.    The omission of authentication code and the inclusion of the order number in the Order
      Status URL created a commonly known and reasonably foreseeable vulnerability in the
      Order Status application often referred to as "broken account and session management."
      Any visitor to the Tower Web site who entered a valid order number in the Order Status
      URL could view certain personal information relating to other Tower consumers,
      specifically, the consumer's name, billing and shipping addresses, email address, phone
      number, whether the product purchased was a gift, and all Tower products purchased
      online. The vulnerability lasted for eight days and was exploited by a number of visitors
      to the site. In December 2002, personal information relating to approximately 5,225
      consumers was accessed by unauthorized users, and at least two Internet chat rooms
      contained postings about the vulnerability as well as comments about some consumers'
      purchases.

10.   Respondents created this vulnerability by failing to implement procedures that were
      reasonable and appropriate to detect and prevent vulnerabilities in their Web site and
      applications, including reasonable and appropriate procedures for writing and revising
      Web-application code. Among other things, Respondents failed to: implement
      appropriate checks and controls on the process of writing and revising Web applications;
      adopt and implement policies and procedures regarding security tests for its Web
      applications; and provide appropriate training and oversight for their employees

                                         Page 3 of 4
      regarding Web application vulnerabilities and security testing.

11.   The security risks associated with broken account and session management are widely
      known in the information technology industry, as are simple, publicly available measures
      to prevent such vulnerabilities. Security experts have been warning the industry about
      these vulnerabilities since at least 2000, when at least one security organization also
      developed and made freely available security education materials which could alert
      industry about how to prevent such vulnerabilities.

12.   Through the means described in Paragraph 7, Respondents have represented, expressly or
      by implication, that they implemented measures reasonable and appropriate under the
      circumstances to maintain and protect the privacy and confidentiality of personal
      information obtained from or about consumers through the Tower Web site.

13.   In truth and in fact, Respondents did not implement measures reasonable and appropriate
      under the circumstances to maintain and protect the privacy and confidentiality of
      personal information obtained from or about consumers through the Tower Web site. In
      particular, as set forth in Paragraph 10, Respondents failed to implement procedures that
      were reasonable and appropriate to detect and prevent vulnerabilities in their Web site
      and applications, including reasonable and appropriate procedures for writing and
      revising Web-application code. Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 12
      was false or misleading.

14.   The acts and practices of Respondents as alleged in this complaint constitute unfair or
      deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a) of the
      Federal Trade Commission Act.

        THEREFORE, the Federal Trade Commission this          day of                , 2004, has
issued this complaint against Respondents.

      By the Commission.


                                            Donald S. Clark
                                            Secretary




                                          Page 4 of 4