Information about http://www.bom.gov.au/inside/eiab/reports/ar02-03/PDF/Annex.pdf

Tags: annex, appropriateness, climate record, corporate strategy, forward program, future products, graphic services, hydrological, national climate, oceano, optimal balance, program advisory board, public interest, public weather, related services, services maintenance, severe weather, stakeholder, statutory body, strategic assessment,
Pages: 6
Language: english
Created: Mon Mar 1 17:16:11 2004
Display cached document
Page 1
image
Page 2
image
Page 3
image
Page 4
image
Page 5
image
Page 6
image
                                                                                  Annex

           BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY
              ADVISORY BOARD


Establishment of                                   (i) The changing environment affecting
                                                         national and international demand
the Bureau of                                            for the provision of meteorological
                                                         and related services;
Meteorology                                        (ii) The Bureau's Corporate Strategy and
                                                         Forward Program;
Advisory Board                                     (iii) The optimal balance of resources to
                                                         be applied to the various public
                                                         interest priorities of the Bureau
Following on from the 2001 report of the                 including severe weather warning
Strategic Assessment of the Bureau, and on               services, provision of public weather,
the recommendation of the Parliamentary                  climate, hydrological and oceano-
Secretary, the Prime Minister formally                   graphic services, maintenance of the
approved the creation of the Bureau of                   national climate record and the con-
Meteorology Advisory Board in June 2002                  duct of research and investigation;
with a view to its commencing operation in         (iv) The appropriateness of the allocation
the first half of 2002­03. The Board was                 of current and future products and
established initially as a non-statutory body.           services provided by the Bureau in
                                                         the categories of free, cost recover-
                                                         able or commercial;
Role of the Bureau                                 (v) Stakeholder views of the Bureau's
Board                                                    current products and services and
                                                         emerging needs;
The function of the Advisory Board is to           (vi) Any other issues of relevance to
advise the Parliamentary Secretary and the               ensuring the efficiency and effective-
Director of Meteorology on issues of                     ness of the Bureau of Meteorology;
relevance to the proper discharge of the         b) To respond to issues and requests
functions of the Bureau. More specifically,          addressed to it by the Minister, the
the role is set out in the following terms of        Director of Meteorology and members
reference approved by the Parliamentary              of the stakeholder community; and
Secretary.                                       c) To report, at least annually, to the
                                                     Minister on its activities and to make
                                                     recommendations in relation to the per-
Terms of Reference                                   formance and future direction of the
The major responsibilities of the Board              Bureau.
are to:
a) To keep under review, and advise the
   Minister and Director of Meteorology on:

                                           306
                                                                                          307

Membership
Membership of the Board is by                      · Agriculture;
Parliamentary Secretary invitation, after          · Aviation;
consultation with the Prime Minister. The          · Defence;
initial proposed membership of the                 · Fire and Emergency Services;
Advisory Board was agreed in September             · Environmental Management;
and the Hon. Dr Sharman Stone MP sent              · Marine;
letters of invitation to the prospective           · Media;
members in early October. While the                and/or, as representatives of the following
Director and the Portfolio Secretary are              specialist fields:
included as ex-officio members, the bal-           · Economics;
ance of membership is constituted so as to         · Law;
broadly reflect the Bureau's stakeholder           · Meteorology; and/or
community, with individual members                 · Scientific research.
selected on the basis of their ability to con-     Not surprisingly, some members are recog-
tribute at the highest level to the develop-       nised as contributing expertise and experi-
ment of meteorology in Australia.                  ence in more than one of these areas.
     Members were selected to represent, as            At 30 June 2003, the Bureau Advisory
far as possible, the following broad sectors:      Board comprised the following members:




Member                                  Position

Professor Vicki Sara (Chair)            Chief Executive Officer
                                        Australian Research Council
Mr Ian Castles AO                       Visiting Fellow
                                        National Centre for Development Studies
Mr Mackenzie Craig                      Primary Producer
Mr Barry Grear AO                       Chairman of the South Australian State Disaster
                                        Committee
Ms Sue Howard                           Director of Radio
                                        ABC
Mr Russell Miller                       Partner
                                        Minter Ellison
Professor Peter Schwerdtfeger           Senior Adviser
                                        Airborne Research Australia
Professor Gillian Triggs                Chair in Law
                                        Faculty of Law
                                        University of Melbourne
Mr Roger Beale AM                       Secretary
(ex officio)                            Department of the Environment and Heritage
Dr John Zillman AO                      Director of Meteorology
(ex officio)                            Bureau of Meteorology
308




From top left to bottom right: Vicki Sara, Ian Castles, McKenzie Craig, Barry Grear, Sue Howard,
Russell Miller, Peter Schwerdfeger, Gillian Triggs, Roger Beale and John Zillman.




Dr Zillman's term as Director of                   ly be the Bureau's Head Office, although
Meteorology coincided with the end of the          from time to time meetings may be held at
financial year, and thus the conclusion of         other locations and/or venues.
his ex-officio role on the Advisory Board.            For 2002­03, the following meetings of
At his last meeting as a Board member, the         the Advisory Board were held:
Board expressed gratitude to Dr Zillman
                                                   3 December (meeting 2002/1)
for his accomplishments as Director of
                                                   Held at Parliament House, Canberra
Meteorology and in building a world class
                                                       Attendance: Chair Professor Sara,
Bureau of Meteorology for Australia.
                                                   Members Castles, Craig, Grear, Howard,
   The incoming Director of Meteorology,
                                                   Miller, Schwerdtfeger, Triggs, Beale and
Dr Geoff Love, will join the Board in
                                                   Zillman.
2003­04.
                                                   20 March (meeting 2003/1)
                                                   Held at the Bureau's Head Office,
Activities of the                                  Melbourne
                                                       Attendance: Chair Professor Sara,
Board 2002­03                                      Members Castles, Craig, Grear, Howard,
                                                   Miller, Schwerdtfeger, Triggs, Beale and
                                                   Zillman.
Meetings                                           11 June (meeting 2003/2)
A minimum of two Advisory Board meet-              Held at the Bureau's Head Office,
ings are to be held each calendar year with        Melbourne
an expected maximum of four meetings per               Attendance: Chair Professor Sara,
year. The location for meetings will general-      Members Castles, Craig, Howard,
                                                   Schwerdtfeger, Triggs, Beale and Zillman.
                                                                                         309

   Apologies: Miller and Grear.                broad overview of the Bureau's 2002-03
   The Hon. Dr Sharman Stone MP,               Budget and Forward Estimates situation,
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for    trends in Operating Expenses and Running
the Environment and Heritage, attended         Costs, and a summary of current resource
the inaugural meeting of the Board on 3        issues. At the request of the Board, further
December, welcoming the Advisory Board's       consideration was given to the issue at
active engagement and expressing her           meeting 2003/1 in light of additional infor-
thanks to the Chair and members for            mation on parameter settings for the 2003-
accepting their positions on the Board. The    04 Budget process.
Parliamentary Secretary also met with the
Board during meeting 2003/2.
                                               Staffing
Major Issues examined                          As a specific component of the Bureau's
                                               resourcing issue, the Board looked in detail
in 2002­03                                     at Bureau staffing matters at meeting
                                               2003/2.
At the first meeting of the Board (2002/1),
                                                   Bureau staffing levels have decreased
members were provided with an introduc-
                                               by 20% since 1990-91, and by 8% compared
tion to the Role and Operation of the
                                               to 1994-95 benchmark levels with a project-
Bureau along with specific strategic chal-
                                               ed loss of up to a further 100 in Average
lenges and opportunities facing the
                                               Staffing Level (ASL) over the next five
Bureau.
                                               years. There have been decreases in all
    In the two subsequent meetings, the
                                               major staff categories apart from
Board commenced detailed analysis of
                                               Information Technology Officers and
strategic issues as follows:
                                               Meteorologists.
· the Forward Program 2003-08 and its
                                                   The Bureau has maintained its essential
    resourcing;
                                               operations and services over the past
· staffing the Bureau;
                                               decade in the face of this overall decline in
· consideration of the Bureau's charging
                                               staff numbers through:
    policy;
                                               · greatly increased workloads on individ-
· feasibility of integration of the National
                                                   ual staff;
    Tidal Facility Australia (NTFA); and
                                               · higher levels of risk associated with
· examination of various options for
                                                   equipment maintenance and system
    training.
                                                   disruption;
                                               · reduced hours of coverage in many
Forward Program                                    offices and `borrowing' of severe
                                                   weather forecasting staff from other
2003­08 and its                                    states during prolonged severe weather
Resourcing                                         events, such as fires and floods;
                                               · failure to meet the growing needs of the
The Bureau's Forward Program 2003­08 was           community and specialist user groups
considered at meeting 2003/1. The Board            for high quality data and information in
commended the Bureau on the high quali-            a range of formats;
ty of its Forward Program document and         · failure to keep pace with the advancing
offered some suggestions for improvement           international state of the art of meteoro-
focusing mainly on the need for prioritisa-        logical systems and techniques; and
tion of activities and resources.              · substantial thinning of professional and
   At meeting 2002/1, the Board consid-            technical expertise in many aspects of
ered a paper on Resourcing which set out a         the Bureau's operation.
310

    The Board expressed its total support      an intention to focus on the SSU mission
for the Bureau in building a strong case for   statement at a future meeting.
resources but strongly emphasised the
need for the Bureau to adopt a forward-
looking focus in addressing staffing pres-     National Tidal Facility
sures. It stressed the importance of a tar-    Australia (NTFA)
geted communication strategy that better
makes the connection between staff reduc-      As a current issue before the Bureau, the
tions and the actual impacts on the            advice of the Board was sought on the pro-
Australian public. A number of specific        posed transfer of the functions of the
suggestions as to how the Bureau could         NTFA to the Bureau, noting the resource
support its claims were provided.              issues associated with the transfer and the
    In reinforcing the need for a compelling   proposed strategy for addressing future
case on resource needs, the Board noted        funding arrangements.
that it may be more appropriate to build           The Board supported the concept of
towards the 2005­06 Budget process and to      absorbing the National Tidal Facility of
develop a strong and multi-layered case        Australia (NTFA) within the Bureau, but
that works at all levels from Ministerial to   expressed strong concerns about the possi-
the public at large.                           ble impact of this on other Bureau opera-
                                               tions. It noted the need to address more
                                               comprehensively:
Charging Policy                                · the funding basis for NTFA services,
                                                   particularly in terms of the split
The Bureau's charging policy is set down           between public good and commercial
in 12 Principles that take into account the        services;
primary public interest role of the Bureau,    · the state of the NTFA's assets, including
the `public good' characteristics of many          ownership and depreciation funding;
Bureau products and services, and              · the effective provision of the tsunami
Australia's commitment to various inter-           warning service; and
national Conventions and Regulations           · the proposed model of incorporating
arising therefrom. The Board examined the          the facility within the Bureau.
Bureau's charging principles and accepted          The Board strongly supported the
them in general, with suggestions for          Portfolio Secretary in convening a meeting
minor modifications.                           of key agencies with an interest in the
    The Board also considered the choice       NTFA, including Geoscience Australia and
the Bureau faces in drawing the line           the Department of Finance and
between its basic service and commercial       Administration (DoFA), to map out full
services at the margin. In general, the        costs and develop an appropriate funding
Board was persuaded that the Bureau's          strategy involving major stakeholders.
current approach to charging is in line with
government policy and that major changes
bore significant risk to the balance of com-   Training
mercial and public interest activities.        High-quality education and training pro-
    Board members also discussed the sta-      grams for staff are essential to the capacity
tus and operation of the Bureau's Special      of National Meteorological Services to
Services Unit (SSU). The Board considered      deliver the outcomes expected of them by
whether there would be benefits in having      Government and the community and to
the SSU more or less integrated than it is     sustaining high levels of performance over
presently, but on balance felt that the cur-   time. The Bureau has conducted in-house
rent model is about right. The Board noted     training of specialist staff since 1937.
                                                                                             311

    Bureau training activities are periodi-         the delivery of the initial training of pro-
cally reviewed and evaluated, with the              fessional meteorologists which involved
most recent evaluation undertaken in 1997.          BMTC becoming a university campus. The
A consistent thrust of review outcomes              Board acknowledged the quality of the
over the past two decades has been the              current training programs but emphasised
need to optimise collaboration with the ter-        the need to explore any additional benefits
tiary sector, particularly in the training of       for the Bureau and its trainees that may be
professional staff. Most recently, the 2001         offered by alternative arrangements.
Strategic Assessment of the Bureau of
Meteorology considered there may be
scope for savings to the Bureau through             Inspection of Bureau
greater use of partnership arrangements             Facilities
with universities.
    In order to progress the matter, the            The opportunity to see the Bureau in
Board considered the issues around train-           action has been a significant part of the
ing professional meteorologists at meeting          Advisory Board's introduction to the
2003/2. Discussion focused on a range of            Bureau and understanding of its services
options that were put forward in relation           and operations.
to the delivery of the professional training            In conjunction with scheduled meet-
function in partnership with universities,          ings, the Advisory Board have toured the
including maintaining the current in-house          following Bureau facilities:
arrangements.                                       · the National Meteorological and
    The Board noted issues relating to the              Oceanographic Operations Centre
relative cost of the various options and the            (NMOC);
strategic issues they raise as well as the          · the Bureau of Meteorology Research
critical linkage between recruitment and                Centre (BMRC);
training in the Bureau. Current relation-           · the National Climate Centre (NCC);
ships and involvement with Australian               · the Victorian Regional Office (VRO); and
universities were considered, as were the           · the Bureau's Field Training Annexe.
potential impacts on the range of appli-
cants and on training of defence and over-
seas National Meteorological Service
                                                    Board Representation
(NMS) personnel.                                    Members of the Bureau Advisory Board
    The Board acknowledged the need to              will, from time to time, be invited to attend
make a fully informed and objective deci-           Bureau activities to represent the Board
sion on this matter. To this end, they com-         and to increase their knowledge of the
missioned a study of the feasibility and            Bureau, its operations, services, clients and
implications of an alternative option for           stakeholders.


Board members undertook the following representation duties during 2002­03.

Member                     Activity                                    Date

Peter Schwerdtfeger        14th World Meteorological Congress          May 2003
                                                                       Geneva, Switzerland
Mackenzie Craig            Regional Users Forum                        June 2003
                                                                       Mildura