Tags: academic administration, academic field, academic institution, college of st benedict, comprehensive university, computer science undergraduate, educational association, engineering president, evaluation form, faculty biology, geosciences, mathematics computer, physics astronomy, policymaker, research program director, science undergraduate research, sponsored research, tenured faculty, twelfth national conference, undergraduate research program,
Council on Undergraduate Research
Twelfth National Conference
June 21-24, 2008
College of St. Benedict
St. Joseph, Minnesota
EVALUATION FORM
We would like to hear your comments on the program and scheduling for the conference. We are especially
interested in knowing what we can do to improve the next conference and what features you would retain
or expand.
Name (optional, but if you wish to propose future topics for CUR meetings, we'd like to know who
you are so that we can contact you later.)
_____________________________ email: _____________________
Your position: Your academic field:
___ Untenured faculty ___ Biology
___ Tenured faculty ___ Chemistry
___ Dean ___ Geosciences
___ Provost ___ Engineering
___ President ___ Mathematics/Computer Science
___ Undergraduate Research Program Director ___ Physics/Astronomy
___ Sponsored Research Officer ___ Psychology
___ Other academic administration ______________ ___ Other Social Sciences
___ Grad student or postdoc ___ Arts or Humanities
___ Policymaker ___ Other _____________________
___ Other ____________
Type of academic institution at which you work:
___ Baccalaureate College
___ Comprehensive University
___ Research University
___ 2-year College
___ Technical University
___ Scientific or Educational Association
___ Other ____________________
How did you hear of the CUR Conference?
___ CUR Postcard in the mail
1
___ CUR electronic notices to members
___ Notice on CUR listserv
___ CUR Poster
___ CUR liaison's communication on campus
___ Word of mouth from a colleague
___ Advertisement in print media
___ Advertisement in non-CUR electronic media
___ Other ____________________
What influenced you to come to CUR 2008?
___ Plenary Sessions
___ Interactive Sessions
___ Workshops
___ Funding sessions
___ General camaraderie and informal discussion
___ I came because I'm a CUR Councilor and was attending the business meeting
___ Other _____________
Which plenary sessions did you attend and how do you rate them?
Please rate the sessions on a 1 to 5 scale with 1 as best and 5 as worst.
___ Isiah Warner,
___ Jennifer Blackmer
___ Paul Apostolidis
___ CUR Fellows
Comments and/or suggestions for future plenary topics:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Please rate the workshops/interactive sessions you attended (funding agency presentations are
rated separately). List the title EXACTLY as they appeared in the program.
Very Moderately Not
2
Title Informative Informative Informative
____________________________________ _____ _____ _____
____________________________________ _____ _____ _____
____________________________________ _____ _____ _____
____________________________________ _____ _____ _____
____________________________________ _____ _____ _____
____________________________________ _____ _____ _____
____________________________________ _____ _____ _____
____________________________________ _____ _____ _____
Comments and/or Suggestions on the Format of Workshops and Interactive Sessions:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Please rate the funding agency presentations that you attended, using the titles of the presentations
as listed in the program:
Very Moderately Not
Title Informative Informative Informative
____________________________________ _____ _____ _____
____________________________________ _____ _____ _____
____________________________________ _____ _____ _____
____________________________________ _____ _____ _____
Comments and/or Suggestions: __________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
3
Poster Sessions
DID NOT ATTEND [ ] (skip to next question)
[ ] Attended Cross Disciplinary Posters
[ ] Attended - Disciplinary Posters at Division Open Houses
YES SOMEWHAT NO
Were the Poster Session(s) helpful? ____ ____ ____
Did you feel you had sufficient time to discuss posters? ____ ____ ____
Comments and/or Suggestions: __________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Evaluation of the Conference from the Perspective of your Discipline (or Division)
1. What is your discipline? ______________________
2. Did the conference contain sufficient presentations in your field? Yes [ ] Somewhat [ ] No [ ]
3. Please suggest topics in your discipline for the next conference.
4. Would you be interested in organizing this/these topic(s)? Yes [ ] N[ ]. If yes, please give us your
name and email address at the top of this form?
____ __________________________________________
4. What did you learn from this conference that you will use in your work when you return home?
____________________________________________________________________________________
4
Overall Evaluation of the Conference
Excellent Good Fair Poor
1. Registration process:
Pre-registration _____ _____ _____ _____
On-site registration and check-in _____ _____ _____ _____
2. Housing accommodations:
On-campus _____ _____ _____ _____
Off-campus _____ _____ _____ _____
3. Meals:
Daily _____ _____ _____ _____
Banquet _____ _____ _____ _____
Breaks _____ _____ _____ _____
4. Conference logistics:
Staff _____ _____ _____ _____
Meeting rooms _____ _____ _____ _____
Schedule of events _____ _____ _____ _____
Time for networking _____ _____ _____ _____
Quality of conference materials _____ _____ _____ _____
Shuttle service _____ _____ _____ _____
Vendors' and societies' booths _____ _____ _____ _____
Field trips _____ _____ _____ _____
5. Overall opinion of the conference: _____ _____ _____ _____
Comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Any additional comments and/or suggestions for future conferences:
More time devoted to:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Less time devoted to:
5