Tags: 60s, bes, business methods, computer co, computer generated images, empirical evidence, initial problems, interface commands, interface functionality, interface layout, irms, nique, paten, patent issue, patent value, patents, rents, software patent, tware, user interface,
Empirical Evidence about
Sof tware Patents
by James Bes en
s
A re s tware patents
of
j t like other patents
us ?
C laim:
O ther techs had initial problems
PTO is adapting to s tware
of
U nique opposition
computer co. s in 60s & 70s
mos SW co. s in 90s
t
s tware developers
of
Sof
tware developers supporting
patents f .
or..
1992 1996
Source code 2% 4%
Object code 2% 4%
Pseudocode 1% 10%
Module design 9% 11%
Algorithms 12% 28%
User interface commands 1% 0%
Icons 0% 0%
User interface layout 1% 2%
User interface sequence 1% 2%
Look and feel 0% --
User interface functionality 4% 6%
Computer generated images 1% 0%
Technology Diferences
f
Probability Mean
patent in patent value
suit ($92)
ALL 2.0% $78,168
Chemical 1.1% $332,790
Complex 2.0% $52,024
Other 2.2% $79,570
Software 4.6% $55,421
business methods 13.7%
A dapting?
Probability software patent in suit within 3 years of issue
2.0%
1.5%
1.0%
0.5%
0.0%
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Patent Issue Year
W hat s right about SW patents?
SW patent value (U S public f )
irms
Rents from US SW patents
0.3
0.2
$92 billions
0.1
0.0
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Private value innovation
A nything wrong with SW patents?
Rob Merges:
...software professionals such as Dan Bricklin and
the members of the League for Programming
Freedom were mostly, but not completely, wrong
about the prospects for software patents. Patents
have not killed the software industry; they have not
led to a slowdown in entry; and they do not appear
to have had much if any effect on industry
structure.
Few SW f patent
irms
< 25%
Do SW patents contribute to thickets ?
Manufacturing 75%
Chemicals 5%
Machinery (inc. computers) 24%
Electronics 28%
Instruments 9%
Other manu. 9%
Non-manufacturing 25%
Software publishers 5%
Software services 2%
Other non-manu. 4%
Is
s ue:
Future ofSW industry
C os & Benef
ts its
6.0
5.0
4.0
Rents from US SW patents
$92 billions
Cost of US SW patent litigation to
3.0 alleged infringers
2.0
1.0
0.0
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
?
"uzzy" boundaries => inadvertent inf
f ringement
C hemicals
Trans6-2- or 4-
- [ (3- carboxamido-
s tituted pyrrol--
ubs 1yl)alkyl]4-
-
hydroxypyran- ones
2-
Software
point ofs location
ale
material obj ect
inf
ormation manuf acturing machine
Patent boundaries
Relative
frequency of
claim
construction
appeal
ALL 1.0
Chemical 0.8
Complex 0.9
Other 1.1
Software 2.2
business methods 6.7
Biotechnology 2.4
I
nadvertent inf
ringement:
SW patents TA X innovation
Patent Laws Filed
uits
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
SW patents &
patent ref
orm
Percent of
lawsuits
(2002)
Chemical 13%
Complex 34%
Other
Software 26%
business methods 4%
Biotechnology 3%