Information about http://www.oilendgame.com/pdfs/MediaKit/MediaWtOEg_Facts.pdf

For…

Tags: biofuels, carbon dioxide emissions, economic stability, energy independence, fuel energy, global competitiveness, gulf intervention, light vehicles, middle eastern oil, national security, oil import bill, peacetime, persian gulf, rmi, rocky mountain institute, saudi arabia, security investments, three quarters, unit of energy, winning the oil endgame,
Pages: 2
Language: english
Created: Fri Sep 17 16:36:13 2004
Display cached document
Page 1
image
Page 2
image
                                                                  For additional information contact:
                                                                           Rocky Mountain Institute
                                                                                      (970) 927-3851
                                                                                   outreach@rmi.org
                                                                              www.oilendgame.com




                            Winning the Oil Endgame
                                          Fact Sheet

      STRENGTHEN NATIONAL SECURITY, ENERGY INDEPENDENCE, AND THE
                              ECONOMY

·   U.S. global competitiveness, economic stability, and national security are compromised by over-
    reliance on foreign oil, particularly Middle Eastern oil.
·   The United States consumes 26 percent, produces nine percent and owns two percent of the
    world's oil.
·   The United States imports nearly 60 percent of its oil (and rising). With Saudi Arabia the only
    major producer with capacity to increase supply, national security is a serious issue.
·   An $18 billion annual investment over ten years--the cost of building the tools to get the United
    States off oil forever--is small compared to America's $120 billion/year oil import bill and U.S.
    security investments. For example, the United States spends $50+ billion annually (in peacetime)
    for Persian Gulf intervention readiness.
·   Getting the United States off oil would decrease carbon dioxide emissions by one-fourth with no
    additional cost or effort.


      SAVE HALF U.S. OIL THROUGH EFFICIENCY, COMPETITIVE BIOFUELS,
                            SAVED NATURAL GAS

·   Two-thirds to three-quarters of light vehicles' fuel use is weight-related. Each unit of energy
    saved at the wheels saves seven to eight units of gasoline.
·   In today's average car, 87 percent of fuel energy never reaches the wheels; only half the
    rest--about six percent of fuel energy--accelerates the car. Less than one percent actually
    moves the driver.
·   Fully using proven technologies to wring more work form each barrel of oil can ultimately save
    half of projected 2025 U.S. oil. Saving each barrel would cost $12 (in 2000 dollars). Compared
    with the government's 2025 price forecast of $26 per barrel, that means an annual savings of
    $133 billion by 2025.
·   Once half the oil is saved by efficient use, the other half can be profitably replaced by competitive
    biofuels, such as ethanol and biodiesel, and by saved natural gas.
·   The European Union produced 17 percent more biofuels last year than the United States did.
·   Brazil has replaced one-fourth of its gasoline with cost-competitive, unsubsidized ethanol made
    from sugarcane grown on five percent of its total cropland. Initial startup subsidies have been
    repaid 50 times by oil savings.
·   A modern U.S. ethanol industry would be based on woody crops (like switchgrass and poplar)
    that would not interfere with food-crop production.
·   Growing and refining biofuels will create 750,000 new agriculture jobs by 2025.
·   A 2025 fleet as efficient as the best hybrid cars and SUVs on the market this year would save
    one-sixth of all 2025 oil use or $45 billion per year, equivalent to two Persian Gulfs of oil
    imports.
·   A $90 billion investment to revitalize transportation equipment, combined with a $90 billion
    investment to reinvigorate rural economies, would create one million new jobs.


          EMBRACE INNOVATION TO BECOME GLOBALLY COMPETITIVE

·   U.S. automakers face stiff competition from Japan and the European Union--both already invest
    considerable resources in developing fuel-efficient vehicles.
·   U.S. automakers' market share for light vehicles is steadily declining, with SUVs making up the
    last profit bastion. Toyota has market capitalization greater than the "Big Three" combined.
·   Boeing's fuel-efficient 7E7 Dreamliner uses one fifth less fuel than previous models, yet sells at
    the same price or less.


                             BELIEVE IN SPEED-OF-CHANGE

·   Major technological transformations take 12­15 years to go from 10 to 90 percent adoption,
    based on historical examples.
·   In the 1920's, U.S. automakers switched from 85 percent open wood bodies to 70 percent closed
    steel bodies in six years.
·   In just six months during World War II, the U.S. switched from making four million light
    vehicles per year to making tanks and planes that won the war.
·   During 1977­1985, the U.S. economy grew 27 percent while oil use fell 17 percent, and oil
    imports from the Persian Gulf fell 87 percent.
·   Speeding entry and adoption of state-of-the-art vehicles would save American motorists an
    estimated $390 billion in retail fuel costs through 2025.