Tags: advisory committee, advisory committees, agricultural trade, agriculture sector, american consumers, ascc, commercial environment, commercial import, commercial operations, coordinating council, environment international, government inspections, imported products, imports and exports, international trade data, international trade data system, private relationships, safe port act of 2006, technical business, tsn,
Immediate Actions
September 10, 2007
1. Improve collaboration and information sharing with the private sector to improve
the safety of imports.
A wide range of products that could potentially threaten the health and safety of U.S.
consumers are imported every day. Due to the vast volume of imported products, it is
impossible to ensure safety simply by increasing government inspections. Rather,
engagement with the importing community must be enhanced to gain insights from the
owners and operators of the commercial import infrastructure through which all imported
products reach American consumers, and to share best practices among this community.
To conduct this outreach and improve collaboration with the importing community, the
agencies should expand on existing public-private relationships, such as COAC (Commercial
Operations Advisory Committee), TSN (Trade Support Network), F&ASCC (Food and
Agriculture Sector Coordinating Council), ITACs and ATACs (Industrial Trade and
Agricultural Trade Advisory Committees), and other groups, to seek and share the importing
community's recommendations and best practices with the objective of enhancing import
safety and promoting comprehensive supply chain verification.
Recommendations for implementation of this action will be included in the Working Group's
forthcoming Action Plan.
2. Interoperability Acceleration Instruct Executive Agencies to Complete Their
Identification of Technical, Business and Legal Requirements for Operating Within
the Automated Commercial Environment/International Trade Data System.
The Security and Accountability for Every ("SAFE") Port Act of 2006 requires all Federal
agencies that license, permit, or certify imported products to participate in the International
Trade Data System (ITDS), a "single-window" system for reporting imports and exports
electronically. ITDS will operate as a feature of U.S. Customs and Border Protection's (CBP)
trade data processing system called the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), which
is currently under development. Functional capabilities within ACE are being implemented
in stages, with full operability expected in 2009. Currently, 34 Federal agencies, referred to
as Participating Government Agencies (PGAs), are at varying stages in integrating into
ITDS.
In order to accelerate implementation of ITDS, the Office of Management and Budget should
issue a directive to PGAs requiring that within 60 days of the directive they establish or
refine their Implementation Plan setting deadlines for developing, reviewing and finalizing
conceptual operating plans (Concept of Operations), memoranda of understanding for the
ITDS interface, and a set of technical and business requirements for identifying any
program and system modifications needed to support the interface. This would include
considerations for the budget process. OMB should give special priority to import safety
agencies for this task in the budget process.
Further, in order to accelerate implementation of ITDS, the Office of Management and
Budget should direct that CBP, within 60 days, establish or refine its Implementation Plan
setting deadlines to:
Include information currently reported by importers and carriers to CBP in the ACE Data
Warehouse, where it can be accessed by other agencies.
For more information, visit www.importsafety.gov
Advise other agencies with an import safety mission how they can take full advantage
of current ITDS capabilities and deepen their engagement in ITDS development.
Implement World Customs Organization Data Model messages (new international
standard for customs reporting), which could provide a platform for electronic reporting
of health and safety information in advance of the current ITDS production schedule.
In addition, all PGAs are instructed to:
Within their fiscal year 2009 budget submissions, identify the budgetary resources
needed to support the ACE/ITDS interface.
Within 60 days, designate a senior executive responsible for implementing the
ACE/ITDS interface.
Participating Government Agencies (PGAs)
· AMS - Agricultural Marketing Service (Agriculture)*
· APHIS - Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (Agriculture)*
· ATF - Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (Justice)*
· BIS Bureau of Industry and Security (Commerce)
· BLS - Bureau of Labor Statistics (Labor)
· BTS - Bureau of Transportation Statistics (Transportation)
· CDC- Center for Disease Control (Health and Human Services)*
· Census U.S. Census Bureau (Commerce)
· CPSC Consumer Product Safety Commission*
· DEA Drug Enforcement Administration (Justice)*
· EPA - Environmental Protection Agency*
· FAA - Federal Aviation Administration (Transportation)*
· FAS Foreign Agricultural Services (Agriculture)
· FCC - Federal Communications Commission*
· FDA - Food and Drug Administration (Health and Human Services)*
· FMC - Federal Maritime Commission
· FMCSA - Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (Transportation)*
· FSIS - Food Safety and Inspection Service (Agriculture)*
· FTZB - Foreign Trade Zones Board (Commerce)
· FWS - Fish and Wildlife Service (Interior)*
· GIPSA Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (Agriculture)
· IA - International Trade AdministrationImport Administration (Commerce)
· IRS - Internal Revenue Service (Treasury)
· ITC International Trade Commission
· MARAD - Maritime Administration (Transportation)
· NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (Transportation)*
· NMFS National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration / National Marine Fisheries
Service, Office for Law Enforcement (Commerce)*
· NRC - Nuclear Regulatory Commission*
· OFAC - Office of Foreign Assets Control (Treasury)
· OFE Office of Fossil Energy (Energy)
· OFM - Office of Foreign Missions (State)
· State Logistics Management (State)
· TTB - Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (Treasury)*
· USACE - Army Corps of Engineers (Defense)
*Agencies designated by the Board of ITDS as import safety agencies due to their
roles in licensing, certifying, and permitting import shipments.
For more information, visit www.importsafety.gov
3. Global Collaboration Instruct agencies to develop and increase international
cooperation and collaboration.
The Department of State (State) has contacted host governments in 39 countries that are
top exporters of food and consumer products to the United States to seek information on
how various countries handle import safety issues.. In the coming weeks, State, the Office
of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), and other interested agencies will
analyze the responses to these inquiries and meet to determine appropriate next steps.
As part of these next steps, State and USTR should coordinate with other Working Group
members to determine whether appropriate international and regional organizations could
be helpful in hosting international conferences or other actions to promote product safety, in
order to generate high-level global attention to a worldwide problem. Such events could
provide a forum to exchange information on effective product safety practices, identify
opportunities for regulatory capacity building, and promote science-based regulation,
consistent with U.S. law and our international obligations.
Recommendations for implementation of this action will be included in the Working Group's
forthcoming Action Plan.
4. Agreements with Foreign Governments Instruct agencies to catalog on-going
and planned import safety-related agreements (bilateral and multilateral) with
foreign governments. In addition, require agencies to meet within 45 days and
then on a regular basis to discuss negotiations underway or that are anticipated
and share lessons learned.
Various U.S. government agencies work with foreign governments to conclude and
implement bilateral and multilateral agreements to improve import safety. In many cases,
the agency that has expertise in a particular facet of import safety takes the lead in the
negotiations. The resulting agreements, however, may affect the jurisdiction, operations,
and resources of other agencies. Therefore, coordination among all the relevant agencies is
necessary to ensure that all such agreements are as effective as possible and can be fully
implemented.
Currently, coordination procedures vary depending on the nature of the agreement. Despite
the various existing means for coordination, interagency work on import safety negotiations
with foreign governments can be improved. In particular, efforts should be made to
increase interagency awareness of agencies' ongoing and planned discussions with foreign
governments regarding import safety agreements. In addition, the current coordination
processes should be modified to provide a forum for agencies to share successful strategies
and approaches with other agencies that could benefit from their experiences. Earlier and
improved coordination will help ensure that agreements fully benefit from relevant agencies'
experiences, avoid duplicative or counterproductive efforts, and generally improve the
negotiating position of the U.S. government.
To this end, as an immediate action, agencies should be required to catalog ongoing and
planned discussions with foreign governments regarding import safety. Until the Action Plan
is issued, the Department of Commerce should host regular advisory meetings for these
agencies to share information about their efforts, experiences and concerns. This process is
not a review and would in no way supplant or delay the TPSC and C-175 processes, or any
other on-going relevant inter-agency process. International cooperation regarding law
enforcement or other similar activities would not be subject to these meetings.
For more information, visit www.importsafety.gov