NIST WTC 7 Investigation Finds Building Fires Caused Collapse …

NIST WTC 7 Investigation Finds Building
Fires Caused Collapse
                                                    Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The
                                                    buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of
                                                    WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around
                                                    Column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 44 and 79, and cascading
                                                    floor failures




The fall of the 47-story World Trade Center building 7 (WTC 7) in New York City late in the
afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001, was primarily due to fires, the Commerce Department's National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announced today following an extensive, three-year
scientific and technical building and fire safety investigation. This was the first known instance of fire
causing the total collapse of a tall building, the agency stated as it released for public comment its
WTC investigation report and 13 recommendations for improving building and fire safety.


"Our study found that the fires in WTC 7, which were uncontrolled but otherwise similar to fires
experienced in other tall buildings, caused an extraordinary event," said NIST WTC Lead Investigator
Shyam Sunder. "Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a
fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down."

"Video and photographic evidence combined with detailed computer simulations show that neither
explosives nor fuel oil fires played a role in the collapse of WTC 7," Sunder said. The NIST investigation
team also determined that other elements of the building's construction--namely trusses, girders and
cantilever overhangs that were used to transfer loads from the building superstructure to the columns of the
electric substation (over which WTC 7 was constructed) and foundation below--did not play a significant
role in the collapse.

According to the report, a key factor leading to the eventual collapse of WTC 7 was thermal expansion of
long-span floor systems at temperatures "hundreds of degrees below those typically considered in current
practice for fire resistance ratings." WTC 7 used a structural system design in widespread use.

Citing its one new recommendation (the other 12 are reiterated from the previously completed investigation
of the World Trade Center towers, WTC 1 and 2), the NIST investigation team said that "while the partial
or total collapse of a tall building due to fires is a rare event, we strongly urge building owners, operators
and designers to evaluate buildings to ensure the adequate fire performance of the structural system. Of
particular concern are the effects of thermal expansion in buildings with one or more of the following
features: long-span floor systems, connections not designed for thermal effects, asymmetric floor framing
and/or composite floor systems." Engineers, the team said, should be able to design cost-effective fixes to
address any areas of concern identified by such evaluations.

The investigators also reported that if the city water main had not been cut by the collapse of World Trade
Center towers 1 and 2 (WTC 1 and WTC 2), operating sprinklers in WTC 7 would likely have prevented its
collapse. "Nevertheless," Sunder said, "we recommend that building standards and codes be strengthened
beyond their current intent to achieve life safety by preventing structural collapse even during severe fires
like this one, when sprinklers do not function, do not exist or are overwhelmed by fire."


Original story at www.physorg.com/news138546437.html                                                             Page 1/3
Sunder identified several existing, emerging or even anticipated capabilities that could have helped prevent
WTC 7's collapse. He cautioned that the degree to which these capabilities improve performance remains
to be evaluated. Possible options for developing cost-effective fixes include:

-- More robust connections and framing systems to better resist effects of thermal expansion on the
structural system.

-- Structural systems expressly designed to prevent progressive collapse, which is the spread of local
damage from a single initiating event, from element to element, eventually resulting in the collapse of an
entire structure or a disproportionately large part of it. Current model building codes do not require that
buildings be designed to resist progressive collapse.

-- Better thermal insulation (i.e., reduced conductivity and/or increased thickness) to limit heating of
structural steel and to minimize both thermal expansion and weakening effects. Insulation has been used to
protect steel strength, but it could be used to maintain a lower temperature in the steel framing to limit
thermal expansion.

-- Improved compartmentation in tenant areas to limit the spread of fires.

-- Thermally resistant window assemblies to limit breakage, reduce air supply and retard fire growth.

The 12 recommendations reiterated from the WTC towers investigation address several areas, including
specific improvements to building standards, codes and practices; changes to, or the establishment of,
evacuation and emergency response procedures; and research and other appropriate actions needed to help
prevent future building failures.

Determining the probable collapse sequence for WTC 7, NIST found that the impact of debris from the
collapse of WTC 1 ignited fires on at least 10 floors of WTC 7, and the fires burned out of control on six
lower floors. The heat from these uncontrolled fires caused thermal expansion of the steel beams on the
lower floors of the east side of WTC 7, damaging the floor framing on multiple floors. Eventually, a girder
on Floor 13 lost its connection to a critical interior column that provided support for the long floor spans on
the east side of the building. The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to
collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the fifth floor. Many of these floors had already
been at least partially weakened by the fires in the vicinity of the critical column. This collapse of floors left
the critical column unsupported over nine stories.

"When this critical column buckled due to lack of floor supports, it was the first domino in the chain,"
Sunder explained. "What followed in rapid succession was a progression of structural failures. Failure first
occurred all the way to the roof line--involving all three interior columns on the most eastern side of the
building. Then, progressing from east to west across WTC 7, all of the columns in the core of the building
failed. Finally, the entire façade collapsed."

 The investigation team considered the possibility of other factors playing a role in the collapse of WTC 7,
including the possible use of explosives, fires fed by the fuel supply tanks in and under the building, and
damage from the falling debris of WTC 1.

The team said that the smallest blast event capable of crippling the critical column would have produced a
"sound level of 130 to 140 decibels at a distance of half a mile," yet no noise this loud was reported by
witnesses or recorded on videos.

As for fuel fires, the team found that they could not have been sustained long enough, could not have
generated sufficient heat to fail a critical column, and/or would have produced "large amounts of visible



Original story at www.physorg.com/news138546437.html                                                   Page 2/3
smoke" from Floors 5 and 6, which was not observed.

Finally, the report notes that "while debris impact from the collapse of WTC 1 initiated fires in WTC 7, the
resulting structural damage had little effect in causing the collapse of WTC 7."

The investigation team found that the design of WTC 7 was generally consistent with the New York City
building code in effect at the time. The estimated 4,000 occupants of WTC 7 on the morning of Sept. 11
were evacuated without any fatalities or serious injuries.

To reach the conclusions in its report, NIST complemented its in-house expertise with private-sector
technical experts; accumulated an extensive collection of documents, photographs and videos related to the
WTC events of 9/11; conducted first-person interviews of WTC 7 occupants and emergency responders;
analyzed the evacuation and emergency response operations in and around WTC 7; and performed the most
complex computer simulations ever conducted to model a building's response behavior and determine its
collapse sequence due to a combination of debris impact damage, fires and a progression of structural
failures from local fire-induced damage to collapse initiation, and, ultimately, to global collapse.

Source: NIST


This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, no part
may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.




Original story at www.physorg.com/news138546437.html                                                      Page 3/3