Tags: beijing china, beijing declaration, critical priority, gef assembly, generosity, global change, global environment facility, global level, grandchildren, interdependent world, johannesburg south africa, last decade, millennium development goals, multilateral action, participant, poverty eradication, principles of sustainable development, republic of china, rio declaration, world summit on sustainable development,
October18, 2002
Second GEF Assembly
Beijing, China
October 16-18, 2002
BEIJING DECLARATION OF THE SECOND GEF ASSEMBLY
The Second Global Environment Facility Assembly,
Having met in Beijing, China, from October 16-18, 2002,
Expressing its deep appreciation to the Government and people of the People's Republic
of China for hosting the Assembly and for their exceptional generosity, hospitality and
arrangements extended to all Participants,
Taking note of the views expressed by Representatives of GEF Participant states at this
Assembly,
Recognizing that managing the global environment benefits all people, since we live in an
integrated and interdependent world, and that sustainable development is essential to secure
poverty eradication and greater welfare for all people,
Acknowledging that the last decade has been a period of significant global change and
underscoring the importance of the Millennium Development Goals and amongst those in
particular the goal "to free all of humanity, and above all our children and grandchildren, from
the threat of living on a planet irredeemably spoiled by human activities, and whose resources
would no longer be sufficient for their needs."
Welcoming the conclusions of the World Summit on Sustainable Development held in
Johannesburg, South Africa, in August/September 2002, that deepened and strengthened the
concept and principles of sustainable development, confirmed the importance of multilateral
action at the global level and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities as set
out in principle 7 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and endorsed as a
critical priority the effective implementation of the WSSD Plan of Implementation,
Noting that since the first Assembly, the GEF has produced significant results in
effectively using its resources for global environmental protection and sustainable development,
1
has strengthened and clarified its institutional structure, and improved the efficiency and
effectiveness of its management and operations,
Welcoming the successful and substantial Third Replenishment of the GEF Trust Fund in
the amount of US$2.966 billion (SDR 2.341 billion) which includes voluntary contributions and
which will provide additional resources necessary to enable the GEF to address the funding
requirements of new focal areas and existing ones and to continue to be responsive to the needs
and concerns of its recipient countries,
Reaffirming the GEF's overarching objectives, as enunciated in the Instrument for the
Establishment of the Restructured GEF, of providing new and additional grant and concessional
funding to meet the agreed incremental costs of measures to achieve global environmental
benefits within a framework of sustainable development,
Noting that the GEF is a novel multilateral entity based on a partnership among member
states as well as among the GEF Secretariat, STAP, and the three implementing agencies -
UNDP, UNEP and the World Bank - which have made significant contributions to the evolution
and success of the GEF,
Welcoming the increasing partnership with the African Development Bank, the Asian
Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Inter-
American Development Bank, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the
International Fund for Agricultural Development, and the United Nations Industrial
Development Organization through expanded opportunities for executing agencies,
Also recognizing that the GEF is the only multi-convention financing facility in existence
and is now the major source of funding specifically supporting the Convention on Biological
Diversity and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and that the GEF is also a
source of funding supporting the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants and the
UN Convention to Combat Desertification,
Welcoming the steps that have been taken to further strengthen the relationships with
these conventions,
Agreeing that the GEF should continue to evolve and apply lessons learned, taking note
of Council's decisions and the views and proposals of the Participants and drawing upon the
analysis and recommendations from the Second Overall Performance Study of the GEF (OPS2),
the third replenishment of the GEF Trust Fund and the CEO's Report on the Policies, Operations
and Future Development of the GEF,
Agrees that in order to further strengthen the GEF to respond to its evolving challenges:
2
Expanded mandate of the GEF
1. Land degradation, primarily desertification and deforestation, and persistent organic
pollutants shall be new GEF focal areas. In this regard, the decision approved by the Assembly
to amend the Instrument for the Establishment of the Restructured GEF is appended to this
statement.
2. The Assembly, recalling paragraph 39(f) of the WSSD Plan of Implementation, confirms
that the GEF shall be available as a financial mechanism of the UN Convention to Combat
Desertification in those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification,
particularly in Africa, pursuant to paragraph 21 of the Convention, if the Conference of the
Parties should so decide. In this regard, the Assembly requests the Council to consider any such
decision of the Conference of the Parties with a view to making the necessary arrangements.
Third replenishment of the GEF Trust Fund
3. In welcoming the third replenishment, the largest ever, the Assembly calls upon countries
and other entities who are in a position to do so to make additional contributions to the GEF.
World Summit on Sustainable Development
4. The GEF should assist in the implementation of the results of the WSSD through its
work, consistent with its mandate and taking into account the situation of Least Developed
Countries and Small Island Developing States. In particular, the GEF should take into account
the importance placed by the Summit on regional and sub-regional initiatives, such as NEPAD
and the Barbados Programme of Action for the Sustainable Development of Small Island
Developing States, and on public participation, stakeholder involvement and partnerships.
Enhancement of GEF activities at the country level
5. Country drivenness and country ownership are essential to the success of GEF activities.
GEF activities should be consistent with national priorities and integrated into national planning
frameworks, such as national sustainable development strategies and poverty reduction
strategies. The GEF should consult with each country on the range of operational tools and
programming options developed for accessing GEF assistance (e.g. the small grants program,
enabling activities, medium-sized projects, the programmatic approach, and strategic
partnerships) so as to tap the most appropriate tools to address needs and enhance performance
and effectiveness.
6. The GEF should continue to enhance its partnership with civil society, including non-
governmental organizations, local communities and indigenous peoples' organizations, at the
country level. In this regard, the GEF should seek to expand the Small Grants Program to more
countries, and in particular to the Least Developed Countries and Small Island Developing
States.
7. National operational focal points should be strengthened to effectively carry out their
responsibilities in the GEF.
3
Capacity building
8. Capacity building is essential to achieving results and improving performance at the
country level. The capacity needs and priorities of recipient countries should be identified and
addressed in a systematic way if such countries are to be effective in addressing global
environment issues. Where a need is identified for capacity building, removal of policy barriers
or strengthening of other conditions that contribute to project success, such capacity building
needs or barriers should be addressed as a first step.
9. In addressing capacity building, the GEF should foster synergies amongst the global
environmental conventions and coordinate enabling and capacity building activities to achieve
effectiveness, efficiency, and better mainstreaming of global environmental issues into the
sustainable development agenda. Medium sized projects should play an important role in GEF
action for capacity building, particularly in Least Developed Countries and Small Island
Developing States.
Strategic planning
10. The GEF should enhance its strategic business planning for allocating scarce GEF
resources to high priority areas within and among focal areas, taking into account national
priorities, with a view towards maximizing the impact of these resources on global
environmental improvements and promoting sound environmental policies and practices
worldwide.
Project cycle
11. The GEF should continue to be a cutting-edge, country-driven facility that is creative,
responsive and capable of programming sustainable global environmental benefits. In this
regard, the GEF project cycle should be reviewed, in cooperation with the Implementing and
Executing Agencies as well as national operational focal points, with a view towards making it
more simple and efficient and taking into account lessons learned and findings of the GEF
monitoring and evaluation program.
Incremental Costs
12. GEF should continue its efforts to make more understandable the concept of agreed
incremental costs and global benefits by countries and staff of the Implementing and Executing
Agencies. Efforts should be aimed at linking global environmental benefits and incremental
costs in a negotiating process that partner countries and the GEF would use to reach agreement
on incremental costs, recognizing that the process for determining incremental costs should be
transparent, flexible and pragmatic.
Catalytic Role
13. The GEF should strengthen its catalytic role, through mainstreaming, cofinancing, and
particularly the replication of successful activities on a much larger scale.
4
Technology Transfer and Private Sector
14. The GEF should enhance technology transfer by strengthening public-private
partnerships and technology cooperation, both North/South and South/South.
15. Recognizing previous efforts to engage the private sector, the GEF should develop a new
strategy, in dialogue with private sector entities, to better engage the private sector with greater
emphasis on the development of an enabling environment and market-oriented strategies to
enhance sustainability and replication. Such a strategy should aim to further improve operational
procedures so as to expand GEF partnerships with the private sector.
Measuring performance through strengthened monitoring and evaluation
16. The GEF should ensure that strategic goals and priorities established in the strategic
business plan are linked to programmatic and project performance indicators, including expected
outcomes that can be monitored and measured with a view to assessing progress towards
fulfilling such strategic goals.
17. In this regard, the GEF monitoring and evaluation unit, for purposes of evaluation, should
be made independent, reporting directly to the Council. The GEF should establish procedures to
disseminate lessons learned and best practices to ensure more systematic use of the results and
outputs of GEF projects for the improvement of planning and subsequent activities.
18. The Assembly expresses its deep appreciation to Mohamed T. El-Ashry for his
outstanding commitment and strong leadership and vision in building the GEF as the premier
funding mechanism for the global environment during his decade of service as the first
CEO/Chairman of the GEF.
5
Appendix
Decision of the Second Global Environment Facility Assembly
The Second Global Environment Facility Assembly,
Recalling paragraph 34 of the Instrument for the Establishment of the Restructured
Global Environment Facility,
Having considered the recommendations of the GEF Council for proposed amendments
to the Instrument,
1. Approves by consensus the following amendments to the Instrument:
(a) Amend paragraph 2 by adding two new subparagraphs (e) and (f), which reads:
"(e) Land degradation, primarily desertification and deforestation; and
(f) Persistent organic pollutants."
(b) Revise paragraph 3 to read:
"The agreed incremental costs of activities to achieve global environmental
benefits concerning chemicals management as they relate to the above focal areas
shall be eligible for funding. The agreed incremental costs of other relevant
activities under Agenda 21 that may be agreed by the Council shall also be
eligible for funding insofar as they achieve global environmental benefits by
protecting the global environment in the focal areas."
(c) Insert a new sentence before the penultimate sentence of paragraph 6, which
reads:
"The GEF shall also be available to serve as an entity entrusted with the operation
of the financial mechanism of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic
Pollutants."
(d) Amend the penultimate sentence of paragraph 6 to read:
"In such respects, the GEF shall function under the guidance of, and be
accountable to, the Conferences of the Parties which shall decide on policies,
program priorities and eligibility criteria for the purposes of the conventions."
6
(e) Amend paragraph 21(f) to read:
"Coordinate with the Secretariats of other relevant international bodies, in
particular the Secretariats of the conventions referred to in paragraph 6, the
Secretariats of the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer
and its Multilateral Fund and the United Nations Convention to Combat
Desertification in Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification,
Particularly in Africa."
2. Invites the CEO/Chairman of the Facility to submit these amendments to the
Implementing Agencies and the Trustee and to request that the y adopt the amendments in
accordance with their respective rules and procedural requirements.
3. Invites the CEO/Chairman of the Facility to inform all Participants of the effectiveness of
the amendments once the Implementing Agencies and Trustee have approved them.
7