Tags: californians, enterprise development, income supplement, income tax credit, incomes, irs, national savings rate, nonprofit corporation, panelists, poverty level, poverty rate, public hearing, safe place, single mother, stuhldreher, tax refunds, us bank, valley neighborhood, visitacion valley, work incentive,
OP EN FORUM
IRS should help us bank our refunds
Anne Stuhldreher
Wednesday, March 30, 2005
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-
bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/03/30/EDGCSC0CML1.DTL
Cesilia Bueso, a San Francisco teacher and single mother, won't attend the
public hearing in San Francisco Thursday on reforming the tax code to make it
"simpler, fairer, and more pro-growth." But the panelists have much to learn
from her -- and from a San Francisco effort to help low-income people receive
larger tax refunds and then save some.
Tax refunds provide most Americans with their best shot to save. By April 15,
more than 100 million Americans will have filed for tax refunds that average
$2,000. Even people with modest incomes like Bueso, who earn less than
$36,000 a year, receive sizable refunds (averaging $1,700) from the Earned
Income Tax Credit, an income supplement and work incentive mainly for parents
with children. Bueso saved her EITC each year for five years, which enabled her
to buy a home in San Francisco's Visitacion Valley neighborhood.
People like Bueso can't spend their way into the middle class -- they save their
way into it. But most Americans do not have Bueso's discipline. Our national
savings rate is now at 0 percent. The problem is particularly alarming here in
California, where, according to the nonprofit Corporation for Enterprise
Development, almost a third of families suffer from "asset poverty" -- meaning
they'd only survive for three months at the poverty level if forced to deplete all
of their assets. That's the fourth worst "asset poverty" rate in the nation, just
ahead of New York.
Surprisingly, the IRS is well-positioned to significantly increase the national
savings rate. It can adopt simple low-cost changes to make it easier for people
to save their refunds.
Bueso's experience is again instructive here. She needed a safe place -- a bank
account -- to save up for her down payment. But 10 million families -- and a
stunning 22 percent of Californians, according to 2002 data from the U.S.
Census Bureau -- don't have bank accounts. Many people, most of them low
income, cannot meet bank minimum-balance requirements or lack the proper ID
to open accounts. So, instead, they turn to check cashers and payday lenders,
where they pay more and have little opportunity to save.
In San Francisco, community groups and businesses are turning tax time into an
opportunity to bring low-income people into the financial mainstream. By having
their refunds directly deposited into bank accounts, people can receive them
quickly and avoid taking out costly rapid-refund loans. In partnership with San
Francisco's free tax preparation sites, Wells Fargo is opening free checking and
savings accounts for low-income tax filers. H&R Block is offering low-cost IRAs
to low-income families.
This year, many S an Franciscans will be more likely t o sa v e, thanks
t o the ci t y ' s new W orking Families Credit, a local ma t ch to the
Earned Income Tax Credit tha t will put a fe w hundred ex tra dollars in
t he po cke t s o f the ci t y ' s working poor. (For more information about
eligibility for the credit, call (415) 554-5678 or visit www.sfgov.org.) Ma yor
Gavin New som crea t ed the credit t o increase awarene ss about the
federal EITC, a f t er S an Franciscans neglec t ed to claim be t w e en $ 1 0
million and $ 2 0 million in EITC bene fit s las t y ear.
The IRS can make similar changes at the national level. The easier it is for people
to save, the more they'll save. The IRS could change its forms to allow people to
"split" their refund into "money to save" and "money to spend. " People could
send some to their checking account to pay down their VISA bill and put the
rest into an IRA. This idea was tested last year in Tulsa, Okla. The result? Low-
income individuals -- 75 percent of whom had no prior savings -- deposited
$583 on average into savings accounts.
The IRS could also make it easier to open savings accounts or IRAs right on the
forms, with check-off boxes, or to buy savings bonds with their refunds.
Looking toward the future, community groups in San Francisco hope to test
something called "Working Families IRA." If EITC filers put some of their refund
into these IRAs, their deposits would be matched with philanthropic donations
up to $300. These savings incentives would parallel the $300 billion a year the
IRS gives to middle- and upper-income counterparts to deduct interest on their
mortgages, get tax breaks for investing in businesses, or to save toward
retirement -- great policies, but 90 percent of the benefits go to households
making more than $50,000 per year. Many of these changes can be made
without passing any laws or spending a dime. Higher cost reforms are needed to
help working-poor families in this country. But if the IRS can spur increased
saving to improve the economic security of American families, it should do so
now.