Tags: 11 july, 13 june, academic research, academic scientists, advertisers, bart, business office, career development articles, club 23, curiosity, e mail, europe, home science, jobs, meetings and events, netherlands, related articles, science careers,
Research in industry differs from academic research in several important ways. Page 1 of 4
Jobs Funding Meetings and Events Career Development For Advertisers About Science Careers
Science Home > Science Careers > Career Development > Previous Issues > 2008 > 2008-09-05 > Noordam
CAREER DEVELOPMENT : ARTICLES BUSINESS OFFICE
FEATURES
E-Mail This Article Print This Article Share This Related Articles
Focus On Europe:
Research by the
Mastering Your Ph.D.: Is Industry Right for Numbers?
You? 11 July 2008
Bart Noordam
Netherlands Industrial Postdocs: The
5 September 2008 Road Less Traveled
13 June 2008
As you worked toward your Ph.D., it might have crossed your Packaging Yourself for
mind that your research activities seem to be of little short- Product Companies
term value and mostly curiosity driven. Join the club. 23 May 2008
Relatively few academic scientists see an immediate or
More
short-term payoff to their work.
For better or worse--we do not judge whether it is right or
CAREER TOOLS AND
wrong--the science-related corporate world values research RESOURCES
quite differently, as an essential part of a business strategy.
For scientists in industry, this means less freedom--but it also
means a higher probability of a substantial short-term impact. Current Employers
The difference of values between academia and industry Learn more about the
results in different ways of working and a different set of
employers advertising
required skills. positions on our site.
In a corporation,
research is an Here, we discuss several aspects of doing research for a Science Careers Forum
expense that is company. It might help you decide whether a corporate lab
is an appealing destination for your research career. Post a question, get an
expected to be offset answer on our online
by substantial future community
revenues. RESEARCH IN A BUSINESS SETTING
Graduate Programs
The steps between idea and product vary widely in industry. A new gadget for a mobile phone Browse our database of
goes through different phases than does a drug developed at a pharmaceutical company. Still, program profiles
almost all products, in most science-based industries, go through research, development, and
engineering phases before they enter final testing and production.
How-To Guides
Industry's research phase comes closest to the type of work academic scientists are most Writing a resume/CV
familiar with. Corporate research focuses on the company's long-term product pipeline, the
products it hopes to launch over the next 5 to 10 years. Activities during this phrase often are Beating the interview
not related to a product the company is already selling or about to launch; rather, whole new
Getting funding
products are contemplated--even whole new technologies that may or may not become
products eventually. Managing a lab and staff
Building your network
http://careersadmin.aaas.org/content/versionview/19991/2/eng-US/site_access/aa... 9/4/2008
Research in industry differs from academic research in several important ways. Page 2 of 4
Not every science-based company has a true research phase; some companies prefer to bring
promising ideas in from outside by licensing technologies and ideas from other (usually Salary Tools
smaller) companies or academic labs.
Find out how much you're
worth with our salary
After the research phase comes the development phase, when the initial conception is calculator
transformed into a prototype that demonstrates the product's desired functionality. In the
development phase, concepts are either proven or abandoned.
To Advertise Find Products
Finally, it takes a lot of engineering to figure out how to produce a reliable product, with the
desired functionality and quality, at a reasonable cost. The engineering phase is furthest from
the type of research you're probably most familiar with, but the challenges here are no less
formidable. A good idea--or even a good product--cannot serve a company's business needs if
it's too late to market or too expensive to produce.
Some scientists find the constraints imposed by industry undesirable restrictions on curiosity-
driven work or a compromise of pure science for commercial ends. Yet there is an undeniable
thrill in knowing you work on something that will actually be used, whether it's to make the
world a profoundly better place or merely to serve consumers while improving a company's
bottom line. Moreover, resources such as people, equipment, and money are less constrained
as you get closer to a real product.
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ACADEMIC AND CORPORATE PROBLEM SOLVING
One important difference between doing research in these two settings is that in academia the
line between colleague and competitor is vague, whereas in corporate research it is quite clear.
Everyone employed by the same company works together (in principle at least) toward the
same ends. Communication is fast and open within a company, and interactions with the
outside world are restricted. Publishing is carefully controlled in industry so as not to put the
company's intellectual property at risk or disclose too much of the company's strategy.
The academic world is not so starkly divided; today's competitor may well be tomorrow's
collaborator and vice versa. Alliances are always shifting.
In an academic setting, a surprising result can be a breakthrough, providing a new way of
looking at a problem. Even if it isn't a breakthrough, you always have the freedom to redefine
your problem and keep your science marching forward. In such a setting, serendipity can be an
important ally. This academic attitude--being relatively relaxed on the direction of research--has
facilitated much progress in fundamental science.
Corporate researchers rarely have such freedom. In a corporation, research is an expense that
is expected to be offset by substantial future revenues. Only a small fraction of conceivable
research has profit potential within the limits of a company's expertise and resources, and only
the most promising projects are likely to be undertaken. Every new project is a roll of the dice,
and an unexpected result requires a whole new calculation of risk and potential benefit.
Thoroughness, too, must often be sacrificed: Too bad a problem can't be solved completely; in
industry, what's needed, especially in the development and engineering phases, is not a
completely rigorous solution but a way forward on budget and on schedule. A pragmatic
answer to a difficult problem has its own sort of elegance and can be equally satisfying for
certain researchers.
Another consequence of the strong connection between research and the product road map is
that sometimes projects end prematurely. If your company decides for financial or strategic
reasons to abandon a line of activities, research in that area will be curtailed. You may be
required to abandon your professional passion of the last months or years and embrace
something entirely new. This can be quite frustrating, but in the long run regular changes of
direction can stimulate your mind and serve your career well.
COMPANIES CARE
Academic science still follows the tournament model, with all but the most accomplished
researchers often being taken for granted, or at least feeling that way. Once you've survived
http://careersadmin.aaas.org/content/versionview/19991/2/eng-US/site_access/aa... 9/4/2008
Research in industry differs from academic research in several important ways. Page 3 of 4
and earned tenure, your academic freedom allows you to do whatever you like--but outside
your narrow research world, still no one may care.
Although the years of lifetime employment are over, companies really care about their
employees, for very selfish reasons. Companies tend to regard their people--especially their
knowledge workers--as their most important assets. They invest in developing, training, and
retention in order to nurture and keep the staff they need to meet their strategic objectives.
WHO GETS HIRED
Science-based companies are major employers of scientists, including some with Ph.D.s.
Royal Dutch Shell PLC, the British-Dutch oil company, is typical of large, science-based
companies when it comes to hiring. They recruit more than 100 academic scientists each year
from the Netherlands alone, about 30 with Ph.D.s. ASML, a supplier of lithography systems for
the semiconductor industry with more than 2000 people working in research and development
(R&D) in the Netherlands alone, recruits more than 150 engineers every year, about 30 of
them with Ph.D.s.
One common theme in industry hiring is that intellectual attainment isn't the only criterion. Shell
company spokesperson Peter van Boesschoten has an acronym for the skills they seek:
CART, for capacity, achievement, relationships, and technical ability. "Capacity" means the
ability to analyze a wide range of problems, not just those in your narrow area of technical
expertise. "Achievement" is the demonstrated ability to get things done. "Relationships" means
the ability to work well and communicate well with others. And "technical"--well, that part is
obvious to any science trainee.
HOW TO FIND OUT IF CORPORATE RESEARCH IS FOR YOU
Companies provide information, via Web sites and recruiting brochures, about their activities
and employment opportunities, but such information tends to be quite general and promotional.
Career fairs, where you can talk directly to a recruiter (or whoever is staffing the company's
booth), is a better way to learn what type of folks they are and who they are looking for.
Better still is to talk to people within the company with backgrounds similar to yours. Perhaps a
former fellow postdoc or grad student works for the company or knows someone who does.
Don't be shy; pick up the phone and make an appointment, even if you know them only
remotely. Most will be happy to meet you face to face and show you the type of work they do.
But the best way to figure out whether a particular corporate work environment is right for you
is to spend some real time there. Many companies provide such opportunities.
ASML has a fellowship program that allows master's-degree students to experience the ASML
work environment, according to Frank Wolfs, ASML's human resource manager. "Yearly, we
sponsor 30 to 40 master students with a fellowship at the Technical University Eindhoven.
They work on lithography-related scientific problems in collaboration with our R&D
organization. After graduation, they have a 3-year contract to further experience what it is to
work for a leading high-tech company." Many other high-tech companies--especially the larger
ones--have similar programs.
NOT YOUR FINAL DESTINATION
It can be hard to leave an academic research post, especially once you have tenure. Moving
from a corporate research career back to academia is difficult though not impossible; only a
handful of people make the leap, but some do, most in applied programs like engineering
departments at the managerial level, where corporate experience is of greater value to
academia.
It may be difficult to return to basic science once you are in the corporate world, but it's
relatively easy to branch out within a corporate setting.
After several years of R&D experience, many people are eager for new challenges. Many shift
http://careersadmin.aaas.org/content/versionview/19991/2/eng-US/site_access/aa... 9/4/2008
Research in industry differs from academic research in several important ways. Page 4 of 4
to management, production, sales, customer service, or intellectual property. Shell, says
spokesperson van Boesschoten, encourages such changes. "Our people have the ability to
move in and out of research within the course of their career if they so wish. One could start
and build a career in R&D but also move on to an assignment in operations and project
management and then come back to R&D."
A corporate lab might be an interesting environment to do research with a slightly different
twist. It can also provide a step into new kinds of stimulating work later on.
Bart Noordam is a professor of physics at the University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and
director of development and engineering at ASML. He has also worked for McKinsey and Co.
DOI: 10.1126/science.caredit.a0800131
RELATED CONTENT
Mastering Your Ph.D. - Series Index
10 November 2006,
E-Mail This Article Print This Article Share This Related Articles
Magazine | News | Signaling | Careers | Multimedia | Collections | Help | Site Map | RSS
Subscribe | Feedback | Privacy / Legal | About Us | Advertise With Us | Contact Us
© 2008 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All Rights Reserved.
AAAS is a partner of HINARI, AGORA, PatientInform, CrossRef, and COUNTER.
http://careersadmin.aaas.org/content/versionview/19991/2/eng-US/site_access/aa... 9/4/2008