Tags: american physicians, arkin, care patient, consumer attorneys, fifth floor, government accountability project, grand avenue, health administration, hospital medical center, justice association, legal affairs council, liberty coalition, national whistleblower center, patient advocates, physicians surgeons, project health, rights foundation, sbn, second appellate district, supreme court of california,
S156986
In the
Supreme Court of California
=====================
GIL N. MILEIKOWSKY, M.D.,
Plaintiff and Appellant
vs.
WEST HILLS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ET AL.,
Defendants and Respondents.
=====================
AFTER A DECISION BY THE COURT OF APPEAL
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT
CASE NO. B186238
=====================
APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT
American Association for Justice
Association of American Physicians & Surgeons
Consumer Attorneys of California
The E-Accountability Foundation
Government Accountability Project
Health Administration Responsibility Project, Inc.
Health Care Patient Advocates
Legal Affairs Council
The Liberty Coalition
National Whistleblower Center
No Fear Coalition
OSC Watch
Semmelweis Society International
U.S. Bill of Rights Foundation
======================
Valerie Nannery SBN 227394 Sharon J. Arkin, SBN 154858
Center for Constitutional The Arkin Law Firm
Litigation, P.C. 333 S. Grand Avenue
777 6th St., N.W., Suite 520 Twenty-fifth Floor
Washington, DC 2001 Los Angeles, CA 90071
Tel. 202-944-2814 Tel. 213-943-1344
Fax 202-965-0920 Fax 866-571-5676
Attorneys for Amici Curiae
Pursuant to California Rule of Court 8.520(f), we respectfully request leave
to file the accompanying Brief of Amici Curiae in support of Dr. Gil Mileikowsky,
the Plaintiff and Appellant in the above-named action. This application is timely
made within 30 days after the filing of the reply brief on the merits.
IDENTITIES AND INTERESTS OF THE AMICI CURIAE
The American Association for Justice (formerly Association of Trial
Lawyers of America) is a voluntary national bar association whose approximately
50,000 members primarily represent plaintiffs in injury cases, including medical
malpractice cases, in California and in every State. AAJ is committed to the
guarantee of fundamental fairness for individuals before our judicial and
administrative tribunals. AAJ is also convinced that enforcement of fair
procedures for physicians facing peer review is essential to protecting doctors
from retaliation by those who place profits ahead of patients.
The Association of American Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. (AAPS) is a
non-profit, national group founded in 1943 and consisting of thousands of member
physicians, including many in California. AAPS is dedicated to defending the
patient-physician relationship and opposing hospital disciplinary procedures, like
the one at bar, which disrupt that relationship contrary to law. Appellate courts,
including the U.S. Supreme Court, have found AAPS amicus briefs useful. See,
e.g., Springer v. Henry, 435 F.3d 268, 271 (3d Cir. 2006) (citing an AAPS amicus
brief in the first paragraph of its decision).
2
Consumer Attorneys of California, founded in 1962, is a voluntary
membership organization of approximately 3,000 consumer attorneys practicing
throughout California. Consumer Attorneys' members include numerous attorneys
who represent victims injured by medical malpractice. The growing efforts by
hospitals, medical associations and others to retaliate against doctors who testify
on behalf of those victims is of extreme importance to those members. As such,
Consumer Attorneys has a compelling interest in assuring that such retaliatory
practices are circumscribed and prohibited.
The E-Accountability Foundation is a charitable organization that
advocates for due process rights and the rule of law. Its online newsmagazine,
Parentadvocates.org, exposes corruption and fraud and advocates, through in-
depth journalism, for the rights of whistleblowers and people who in good faith
speak out about misappropriations of funds, wrong-doing, and malicious
prosecution, and are retaliated against for doing his/her civic duty.
The Government Accountability Project (GAP)is a non profit, non
partisan public interest organization whose mission is to help whistleblowers,
those employees who exercise free speech rights to challenge abuses of power that
betray the public trust. Since 1977 GAP has represented or otherwise assisted over
5,000 whistleblowers, and been a leader in campaigns to enact or defend nearly all
of America's national whistleblower laws. GAP currently is working for enactment
of statutory whistleblower rights protecting doctors from retaliation through the
use of bad faith peer review as a way to circumvent their legal rights.
3
Health Administration Responsibility Project, Inc. (HARP) is a non-
profit organization that serves as an educational and informational resource for
patients, doctors, and attorneys regarding health care organizations, and seeks to
enhance the quality of medical care benefits provided in the managed care and
hospital setting. HARP thus has an immediate interest in assuring the protection of
the right of physicians to speak freely and openly in order to improve medical care
and to appear in court on behalf of plaintiffs without retaliation by organized
medical groups.
Health Care Patient Advocates (HCPA), a grassroots group of
uncompensated individuals, includes, but is not limited to patients, families,
friends of families, health care professionals and concerned citizens. HCPA's
goals are focused on striving for quality safe care for all patients in all health care
settings, with a focus on dialysis facilities, and to strive towards patients, families,
health care workers and physicians to be able to openly voice concerns regarding
delivery of care without fear of any covert or overt retaliation. We believe that
patients, and their families, look to physicians for protection and, therefore our
expectation is that physicians will be able to speak freely when it comes to any
aspect of delivery of care that will protect their patients and improve patient care.
For more than twenty years, the Legal Affairs Council has fought for due
process, fairness, and accuracy in legal proceedings and criminal prosecutions,
particularly for whistleblowers and individuals being retaliated against for their
activism and political beliefs or unfairly targeted as scapegoats in media and
4
political firestorms. LAC has created legal defense funds in selected
circumstances and joined amicus briefs. LAC remains concerned that standards of
due process and impartial proceedings are vitally important in protecting all
American citizens.
The Liberty Coalition works to help organize, support, and coordinate
transpartisan public policy activities related to civil liberties and basic rights. The
Liberty Coalition works in conjunction with groups of partner organizations that
are interested in preserving the Bill of Rights, personal autonomy and individual
privacy.
The National Whistleblower Center was founded in 1988 in order to
provide assistance to whistleblowers who risk their careers to serve the public
interest. The NWC has assisted whistleblowers throughout the United States,
including within the State of California. We have provided direct assistance to
medical doctors who have disclosed threats to patient health and safety. Our
extensive nation-wide educational and advocacy programs are set forth at
www.whistleblowers.org.
The No FEAR Coalition was founded in 2002 to lead the fight for the
passage of the first civil rights and whistleblower law of the 21st Century: The
Notification of Federal Employees Anti-discrimination and Retaliation Act of
2002. The Coalition provides assistance to whistleblowers who risk their careers
to serve the public interest. The No FEAR Coalition has assisted whistleblowers
throughout the United States, including within the State of California. We have
5
provided a forum and direct assistance to medical doctors who have disclosed
threats to patient health and safety. Our extensive nation-wide educational and
advocacy programs are set forth at www.w3conference.org.
OSC Watch is an ad hoc, grassroots, organization with 3 goals: 1) Expose
long-standing non-compliance by the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) and Merit
Systems Protection Board (MSPB) with key nondiscretionary duties to protect
federal employees from agency violations of the merit system principles of the
federal civil service (also called "prohibited personnel practices (PPP's)"; 2) stop
it, and 3) obtain some measure of justice for the thousands of loyal, patriotic
federal employees harmed by it. OSC Watch supports and defends the merit
system principles of the federal civil service and federal employees who put
themselves at professional jeopardy to adhere to them, including licensed medical
professionals employed by the federal government.
The federal government employs thousands of licensed health care
professionals, who are subject to the significantly self-regulating medical
professions to obtain and maintain the their licenses and practice privileges, which
they generally need in their positions in the federal government. Therefore, the
abuses in the self-regulation of the medical profession addressed in this amicus
brief are of interest to OSC Watch, because the merit principles of the federal civil
service require licensed professionals employed by the federal government to
comply with the rules of professional conduct of those licensing organizations. If
their doing so put them at professional jeopardy in their professions, it is relevant
6
to the merit system principles of the federal civil service and the mission of OSC
Watch.
Semmelweis Society International was founded by physicians who have
first-hand experience in present day sham peer review, a process intended
originally to improve outcomes by educating physicians who have had some
clinical issues. The intent of HCQIA passed in 1986 was to ensure that this
process would occur in a controlled hospital environment by health care
professionals. Unfortunately for most, including Dr. Mileikowsky, this law is
being used to eliminate physicians who are trying to improve the healthcare
environment. Dr. Mileikowsky's case strikes at the heart of due process and how
hospitals have perverted HCQIA to neatly fit in their armamentarium to control
physicians at the expense of quality healthcare. The victims are the patients and
those healthcare professionals who were trying to help them.
The U. S. Bill of Rights Foundation is a non-partisan public interest law
policy development and advocacy organization seeking remedies at law and public
policy improvements on targeted issues that contravene the Bill of Rights and
related Constitutional law. This Foundation has advocated for better legal
protections against bad faith physician peer review and whistle blower retaliation
for the last five years.
7
ASSISTANCE TO THIS COURT
Amici respectfully submit that the accompanying brief will assist this Court
in addressing the important questions presented in this case. These organizations
represent trial lawyers as well as doctors, nurses and other health care
professionals. They include organizations devoted to protecting whistleblowers, to
fostering accountability in government, and to promoting the rule of law. Amici
thus represent a broad diversity of viewpoints that have come together to address
this Court on an issue that affects not only the parties to this case, but the People
of California and many Americans across the country.
Physicians are justly proud of their ethical commitment to the welfare of
their patients. Nevertheless, medical care in the United States has always been
influenced by financial considerations. The legislature, following the lead of this
Court, has enacted guarantees of fairness to protect doctors from malevolent peer
review by those whose first allegiance is to the financial wellbeing of the hospital.
Amici believe that their experiences across the country teach that strict
enforcement of those protective guarantees is essential to maintaining and
advancing the quality of hospital patient care.
8
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the amici curiae respectfully request that the
court accept the accompanying brief for filing in this case.
Dated: August 28, 2008
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________
Valerie Nannery SBN 227394
Center for Constitutional
Litigation, P.C.
777 6th St., N.W, Suite 520
Washington, DC 2001
Tel. 202-944-2814
Fax 202-965-0920
Sharon J. Arkin, SBN 154858
The Arkin Law Firm
333 S. Grand Avenue
Twenty-fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Tel. 213-943-1344
Fax 866-571-5676
Attorneys for Amici Curiae
9