Information about http://www.stanford.edu/group/EMF/projects/EMF25/EMF25.pdf

Terman…

Tags: change energy, change models, climate change, demand projections, economic growth and structure, efficiency analysis, energy conservation programs, energy demand, energy efficiency, energy modeling forum, energy price, energy service, fuel demand, household size, model results, service demands, space vehicle, stanford ca, stanford university stanford, state policies,
Pages: 2
Language: english
Created: Wed Feb 20 10:03:42 2008
Display cached document
Page 1
image
Page 2
image
                                                         Terman Engineering Center, Room 448
                         energy                                             Stanford University
                                                                       Stanford, CA 94305-4026


emf                      modeling
                         forum
                                                                   Telephone
                                                                   FAX:
                                                                                 (650) 723-0645
                                                                                 (650) 725-5362
                                                       URL:http://www.stanford.edu/group/EMF/




        EMF 25: Energy Demand and Efficiency in a Growing Economy

Summary:
The Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) 25 study will evaluate energy demand in a growing
economy and the opportunities for reducing electricity and fuel demand through energy
conservation programs.

Major Questions:
· How does economic growth change energy service demands (household size, floor space,
  vehicle miles traveled and industrial mix)?
· How costly is it to substitute away from the use of carbon-based fossil fuels and petroleum?
· How do programs that improve end-use energy efficiency affect the final demand for
  electricity and fuels?

Motivation:
· Business-as-usual (BAU) energy demand projections are extremely uncertain, given major
  changes in economic growth and structure as well as recent energy price increases.
· Federal and state policies will emphasize end-use efficiency because many policymakers
  consider it quicker and less costly than other options.
· Energy demand options are often represented in aggregated ways in many climate change
  models and therefore may be less insightful for policymakers who want to promote improved
  end-use efficiency.

Analysis:
· Compare model results for BAU scenarios incorporating different assumptions about
  economic growth, energy service demands and the cost of capital.
· Compare model results for constrained scenarios incorporating different assumptions about
  fossil-fuel price levels and the price relationship between fuels.
· Evaluate the role of energy-efficiency improvements relative to supply-side investments in
  reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
· Compare (and perhaps conduct) different ex post evaluations of conservation programs on
  electricity loads.
· Collect data and document promising approaches that may facilitate the representation of
  important end-use technologies in top-down climate change models.
· Document the role of changing economic structure on aggregate energy intensity.
Scope1:
· End-use energy demand sectors, excluding electric generation and petroleum refining.
· Data and model availability may initially restrict the formal model comparison to North
   America. Where data is available, however, current plans include extending the study's
   focus to other major regions where economic growth and energy demand are expanding.
· Emphasis will be on next 30 years when evaluating the penetration of existing technologies.
· Coverage will include the very long run when evaluating development of new technologies.
· Focus will be on what may happen under different conditions rather than on what govern-
   ment policy should do. Policy conclusions about how much energy efficiency is cost
   effective are unlikely, given that the study will bring together a diverse group of experts who
   may hold diverse opinions on the size of the energy-efficiency "gap".

Potential Modeling Systems2:
· Existing climate change integrated assessment models - e.g., MiniCAM, EPPA (MIT),
   MERGE, ADAGE, MS-MRT (CRA).
· Existing energy system models - e.g., NEMS, NEMS-GPRA, U.S. MARKAL, CIMS.
· Existing energy-economy models ­ e.g., Dale W. Jorgenson Associates IGEM, U. Maryland
   Inforum LIFT (Long-term Interindustry Forecasting Tool).
· Existing electricity models ­ e.g., HAIKU (RFF).
· Sectoral models.

Communication of Findings:
· The study will communicate these results through
         - a summary final report for policymakers,
         - a more technical volume for modelers and other experts,
         - and testimony and presentations by study group participants.
· Additionally, the EMF is planning a website covering critical data, key study conclusions,
  and supporting and related papers on methodology and results.




1
 Scope may change as EMF updates information about data and modeling.
2
 Named models are examples of systems that could be included. We hope to solicit their participation in the
coming months.