PROJECT UNITY …

                             PROJECT UNITY

                              Chapter Two
                            A Question of Doubt


For the better part of thirty years I have been involved in a little known
program functioning under the code name of Project Unity, whose main
objective has been to identify, define and apply the underlying dynamic
force determining the form and function of physical structure.

On March 24, 2002 I sent a communiqué to the Canadian Space Agency in
Ottawa, describing the successful discovery of this underlying force. I
pointed out the inherent limitations associated with conventional science and
technology, while emphasizing the benefits Project Unity was capable of
providing.

In this communication I made reference to the lunar geological samples
returned to Earth more than thirty years ago during the Apollo Missions,
whereby tests were performed at the Johnson Space Center in Houston,
Texas under the direction of the Lunar Quarantine Program, to determine if
the lunar material represented a hazard to the Earth's ecology.

During this initial testing, numerous plant and animal species were exposed
to and injected with lunar material. And in one particular test, the one which
I am most familiar, two species of plants, beans and corn, were exposed to
lunar material, resulting in accelerated growth, genetic deformities and
cancerous anomalies, despite the fact that the lunar material was not
radioactive beyond normal background levels.

This test involved the lunar material being pulverized to a very fine powder
and placed in solution with water, whereby this solution was applied directly
to the soil in which the two species of plants, beans and corn, had been
planted.

Two control plots were also planted with beans and corn, but were not
exposed to the lunar material, in that the watering solution applied to the
control plots contained no lunar material. Both the beans and corn in the
two control plots developed at a normal rate and suffered no genetic
deformities or cancerous anomalies.


                             © 2006 David Barclay                             1
                              PROJECT UNITY


At the time of this test the scientists involved did not understand why the
lunar material affected the plants in this manner, as they were at a total loss
to explain why such adverse alterations and ill effects had occurred.

This test was well documented and was later aired on public television as a
special presentation sanctioned by NASA. As well, information pamphlets
were printed and distributed by NASA describing this test, including photos
of the plants suffering the adverse alterations and ill effects resulting from
exposure to the lunar material, as well as photos of the control plants which
developed in a normal manner.

Now, after more than thirty years of virtually isolated effort, Project Unity
had finally discovered why the lunar material affected the beans and corn in
such an adverse manner, which in my mind at least, represented a significant
achievement. But little did I realize that the original test results had now
been altered and for the most part deleted from official records.

I received a reply back from the Canadian Space Agency informing me that
they had checked out my contentions regarding the affects of the lunar
material and had found no documentation by which to substantiate my claim
that such adverse alterations and ill effects had occurred.

It was further stated that the numerous plants and animals exposed to and or
injected with lunar material suffered no adverse alterations of ill effects of
any kind. However, there was evidence indicating that the various plant
species exposed to the lunar material did experience accelerated growth,
which NASA suggests might be of benefit to farmers.

At first I thought this was simply the result of a most unfortunate
misunderstanding, as it seemed utterly absurd to suggest that such well
documented test results could simply be deleted from the record.

But, in checking the on-line NASA archives, I discovered that NASA did in
fact deny any adverse alterations or ill effects having occurred in relation to
the various plant and animal species having been exposed to or injected with
the lunar material.

Wow, what a shock. After all the years of having those scary NASA photos
of deformed bean and corn plants sitting on my desk, NASA was now

                              © 2006 David Barclay                                2
                              PROJECT UNITY

denying that any such adverse effects had occurred.

There must be millions of people who remember watching NASA scientists
performing this test on television, in respect to the accelerated rate of
growth, genetic deformities and cancerous anomalies affecting the bean and
corn plants exposed to the lunar material.

So what happened? What happened was that the test results indicated the
existence of a very serious problem, which would adversely affect future
manned missions into space, the exploitation of extraterrestrial resources and
the colonization of planetary bodies.

It must be assumed that NASA did not initially comprehend the significance
of this problem, as at the time they were primarily concerned with protecting
public health, agriculture and other living resources from contamination.
And in this respect a great deal of effort went into successfully protecting the
Earth's ecology from any possible hazard associated with the lunar material.

Eventually someone must have realized that the adverse effects of the lunar
material indicated a serious setback, whereby substantial advances in science
and technology would be required to overcome such an obvious hurdle.

I immediately wrote back to the Canadian Space Agency encouraging them
to make a direct request to NASA for clarification, but I heard nothing
further. So I must assume that they simply refused to pursue the matter or
that NASA was insistent upon denying the existence of such a problem.

The importance of this initial test, involving bean and corn plants, cannot be
overstated as I consider the radical results of this test to represent some of
the most important information derived from the exploration of space. As
prior to obtaining the test information from NASA, more than thirty years
ago, I had anticipated that the lunar material would in fact affect accelerated
growth in plants, but I had not considered the possibility of genetic
deformities or cancer.

The reason for not considering the possibility of such adverse effects was
due to the general belief and understanding at the time that the moon and our
neighboring planets maintained a uniform relationship with our Earth, in
terms of the relative uniform condition of each planetary body.



                             © 2006 David Barclay                             3
                              PROJECT UNITY

Since then I have discovered that this is not the case at all or even physically
possible, as no such uniform relationship exists. And although our planet
Earth exists itself in a relatively uniform state, that uniform state or
condition does not correspond to or include the relative condition of the
moon or the condition of any other planets, moons or stars existing relative
to the Earth.

In other words, all other planetary bodies maintain a non-uniform
relationship with our Earth, in terms of a relative non-uniform condition.
And although this is hotly disputed, the adverse test results, which NASA
now insists did not occur, indicated in very explicit terms that no such
uniform relationship exists between our Earth and other planetary bodies.

In this respect I have written several letters to NASA contesting the proposal
to utilize Martian water thought to exist within the Martian geosphere, for
the purpose of a manned mission. My contention warns that the utilization
of Martian water regardless of its apparent or real purity to accommodate
the requirements of a manned mission to Mars would seriously jeopardize
the safety and health of the crew.

My reasoning is based upon the fact that the relative non-uniformity of the
lunar material adversely affected the beans and corn, whereby it can be
expected that similar effects will result form the non-uniformity of Martian
water should it be ingested.

The problem involved here has nothing to do with an organic or chemical
agent contaminating the lunar material or the Martian water, as it has to do
with the underlying dynamic structure of the atoms and molecules
constituting the lunar material and the Martian water. So this is not
something which can be remedied with a little disinfectant or a filter.

This of course might appear confusing as there appears to be nothing
chemically or organically wrong with the lunar material, but there is
something wrong with our existing perceptions of space, time and motion, as
it relates to the structure of our universe.

Unfortunately, due to the complexity of this issue, it isn't difficult for an
agency like NASA to deny the existence of such a problem, they simply
deny the problem exists.



                              © 2006 David Barclay                              4
                              PROJECT UNITY

Had the problem of non-uniformity been openly debated, in respect to the
original test results defining the effects of exposure to and or injection of the
lunar material, the feasibility of the existing space program would have
undoubtedly been questioned.

And had the space program been stalled or confined while scientists and
engineers developed the necessary science and technology allowing for a
uniform access to neighboring planetary bodies, much of the aerospace
industry could have suffered severe financial loses. In fact, many of the
existing contractors might have simply closed their doors or gone bankrupt.

As we know this did not happen, as NASA was fast becoming essential to
the military establishment, while the economic benefits of the aerospace
industry provided prosperity for many. So it was and still is business as
usual, despite the fact that to date the exploitation of extraterrestrial
resources and the colonization of other planetary bodies remains technically
beyond our reach.

To change this existing circumstance requires major revisions to our existing
science and technology which will in turn affect our basic perceptions of the
universe in which we exist.

China has now launched its own space program, with plans to land on the
moon in the next few years. And should they succeed, they will
undoubtedly return with samples of lunar material, at which point they will
discover what NASA has known for more than thirty years. "We have
another problem Houston," but NASA does not want to admit that such a
problem exists, so in an official sense the problem has become a secret.

The obvious thing wrong with such a thing becoming a secret is that millions
of people already know about it, which can make the possible existence of a
secret appear somewhat confusing, in terms of logical reasoning.

To get around that issue it is simply suggested that people are mistaken
about what they believe they remember having seen or heard on television,
read in newspapers or in official NASA publications. And if that doesn't
shut them up, suggestions that they are victims of false memory usually will.

On top of everything else you now have people claiming that NASA faked
the lunar landing, as there are people who claim we did not land on the

                              © 2006 David Barclay                             5
                             PROJECT UNITY

Moon and that the lunar material may have actually come from a mine in
Canada.

As NASA contends that the lunar material caused accelerated growth in
plants, the Creighton Mine in Ontario is claimed by some to be the source of
the lunar material. Undoubtedly plants experience accelerated growth at the
1400 meter level of the Creighton Mine, as there is a horticultural nursery
situated at this level underground, but the various plants grown at the
Creighton Mine experience no adverse effects, such as genetic deformities or
cancerous anomalies.

The reason for this is quite simple, as the environment constituting the
Earth's geosphere maintains a balanced uniform relationship with the
Earth's biosphere. Consequently it would be impossible for the naturally
occurring conditions at the 1400 meter level of the Creighton Mine to
stimulate non-uniform effects corresponding to the adverse effects of the
lunar material, in the form of genetic deformities and cancerous anomalies,
unless highly radioactive materials were present.

There is a similar nursery situated at the 365 meter level of a mine in Flin
Flon, Manitoba, affecting a uniform increase in the growth rate of plants. In
fact the growth of plants is accelerated in any underground setting, with the
rate of growth increasing in proportion to the depth underground.

Consequently the claim suggesting the lunar material came from Canada is
absurd. But whether such claims are absurd or not, they do serve a purpose
beneficial to NASA, as NASA claims that the lunar material, the real lunar
material, also affected a perfectly uniform increase in the growth rate of
plants.

Confusion is an effective distraction, making it that much more difficult to
ascertain the truth. And in this respect NASA does not want the original test
results substantiated, whereby allowing the lunar material to indicate a non-
uniform relationship existing between the Earth and the Moon.

Therefore the absurd claims made by skeptics serve to reinforce the certainty
of fact associated with the authority of NASA officials, who claim that the
lunar material did not cause any structural alterations or adverse effects in
respect to those plants and animals involved in the experimental testing, but
did cause a perfectly uniform increase in the rate of plant growth.

                            © 2006 David Barclay                              6
                              PROJECT UNITY


I suspect that a scandal of this magnitude would not only cause a shake-up at
NASA headquarters, but would also represent an embarrassment to the
scientific and political communities as well.

The intentional distortion of fact concerning this scientific data has directly
affected the advancement of science and technology over the course of the
last several decades, as it is impractical and somewhat irrational to
participate in solving a problem that does not exist. Today most scientists
are convinced that no structural alterations of adverse effects resulted from
exposure to or the injection of lunar material. Therefore it would be highly
unlikely that structural alterations and or adverse effects should be
anticipated by exposure to or ingestion of Martian material having been
adequately cleaned and purified.

In relation to aerospace engineering, it would equally appear to most that the
existing methods of transport and communication presently employed by
NASA are suitable to the task of interplanetary exploration. Furthermore, it
would also appear that the future establishment of a space station on the
Moon or Mars can be achieved on the basis of existing science and
technology.

Unfortunately the existing methods are inadequate and future possibilities
remain dreams, as the existing technological methods employed for the
purpose of interplanetary exploration only allow for a non-uniform window
of access. And a non-uniform window of access does not allow for a
practical means of exploiting the extraterrestrial resources of space or for the
establishment of a permanent base on another planetary body.

Of course we have a space station orbiting the Earth, which further
reinforces the idea of existing technology actually providing a uniform
window of access to other planetary bodies. But this is an extremely
complex issue, which permits a very deceptive view of the circumstance to
prevail.

Never for a second did I consider the possibility of NASA perpetuating a
scientific fraud, but they did and they do. And for all intents and purposes
the lunar skeptics might as well be right in suggesting that a manned mission
has yet to land on the surface of the Moon. After all, what was the point of
the exercise if we fudged the findings?

                              © 2006 David Barclay                                7
                              PROJECT UNITY


At this time it would appear that the point of the exercise had more to do
with political posturing than it had to do with science, just as the idea of
sending a manned mission all the way to Mars or for the Chinese to send a
manned mission to the Moon is a politically motivated adventure.

But suppose the Chinese do go to the Moon and return lunar material to their
laboratories for testing and suppose they discover that the lunar material
causes structural alterations and ill effects in plants and animals. What is
NASA going to say then? That the Chinese testing is faulty or fraudulent or
will they suggest that the lunar material somehow became contaminated by
exposure to solar radiation?

I don't know what NASA will say, but at this point it is doubtful to me that
they will come clean or agree to the fact that our planetary neighbors
maintain a non-uniform relationship with our planet Earth.

Like many of my colleagues I view the exploration of space as a scientific
adventure allowing for an opportunity to take our knowledge and our talents
to the limit, whereby we might discover potential possibilities not previously
thought to even exist. But now I find that for the most part it is not about
science at all, but about the money and the perceived power that many
believe money can buy.

I've never really had a lot of money, nor do I have the ambition to acquire
wealth simply for the sake of wealth, so I would just as soon let them have
their money if that's all they want. But that is not all they want, they want to
stop the rest of us from moving forward, from learning, from understanding
and from comprehending.

Unfortunately, all the money in the world cannot solve the problem of non-
uniformity, nor make it go away. Only an understanding of fact can allow
for a uniform window of access.

Project Unity achieved its primary objective, which was to determine and
define the underlying dynamic force of universe affecting the relative form
and function of all physical structure and then continued on to find practical
applications for the theoretical principles involved.

And in order to achieve that objective it was necessary to go back to the

                             © 2006 David Barclay                              8
                             PROJECT UNITY

drawing board and begin anew. Starting from scratch the bits and pieces
slowly took shape while others slid easily into place allowing the illusive
shadows of universe to be definitively etched against the dynamic
background of a relative condition.

And when you start over from scratch, you assume nothing and question the
validity of everything, which involves going back and examining the most
basic concepts of fact. Even the most mundane assumptions must be
questioned, despite the traditional certainty of historical experimental
evidence.

One of the most fundamental aspects of our modern science involves the
quantification of the various relative values employed, whereby relative
values correspond to relative relationships. In this respect it is imperative
that the assumed accuracy of a relative value not be construed to represent
an absolute value or to suggest the possibility of an absolute value existing
in the context of a relative relationship.

In relation to a relative universe, the condition of universe corresponds to a
relative dynamic response, which can only be described in terms of non-
absolute values. This means that an accurate assessment of universe cannot
be determined on the basis of an absolute value regardless of the apparent
accuracy of the terms employed without restricting the condition of universe
to a static state.




         Read more about Project Unity at www.gravitycontrol.org




                             © 2006 David Barclay                               9